1. The man was trying to break up a fight caused by some other people, and he was pushed accidentally onto the sides of the track. The photographer was nearby, and took a picture so that the flash might warn the train driver(but really?).
2. The photographer said he tok the photo because he thought the flash would warn the train driver, which doesn't make any sense at all.
3. No, because he could have at least tried to help the man. Even if he didn't succeed, he would go home knowing that he tried. But instead, he just stood by and "documented" the event, as if it needed documenting.
4. No, probably not. He should have gone and helped the man, and he should have not been taking a picture. At least like wave your arms and yell at the train driver or something. No, this photographer is in the wrong here.
5. I understand why they decided to run it. It doesn't make running it the right thing to do, but I understand why. I probably agree with running it, because even though it was horrible, it was kinda his job, and even though the guy died, they had a perfectly good photo that they should use.
6. Even though photographers are supposed to document how life is, they are also a part of it. If they see something wrong, they should do something about it. That's called morality, and it's an evolutionary trait for a reason.
7. Photographers are part of the world, even though they are displayed as not. It is not ethical to involve him/herself in the hoots UNLESS, like in the situation here, the photographers is perhaps one of the only people who can make a positive change to an others negative situation.
8. Yes, however, if a photographer is the ONLY person who can make a positive change than the photographer should do that. It is morally unacceptable to stand by and watch these sort of things be committed, and photographers should look out for other people as well.
9. The photographer should not have just stood there and taken a picture, the photographer should have gotten involved, because a human life was about to end AND the photographer could have a positive outcome to the situation. It is in no way acceptable to stand by like you are superior to other people, and using the camera as an excuse is morally wrong.
Tuesday, December 16, 2014
Wednesday, December 10, 2014
Final Review
1.
1. Rule of thirds
The main focus of the image should be along the outside corner, if the image is divided into thirds.
1. Rule of thirds
The main focus of the image should be along the outside corner, if the image is divided into thirds.
2. Balancing Elements
The image should appear balanced by placing objects to one side or another.
3. Leading Lines
The lines should lead along parallel or intersecting path so that it appears a vertigo component.
4. Symmetry and Patterns (repetition)
There should be easily noticeable patterns in the image, be it on material, or objects themselves.
5. Viewpoint
The viewpoint should be an element necessary to determine the subject and purpose of the photo, it should be a necessary component.
6. Background
There should be an apparent background, but it should not interfere with the subject of the image.
7. Create depth
There should be depth to the image, with blurs or size comparison.
8. Framing
There should be a noticeable "frame" or objects or lines surrounding the main subject of the image.
9. Cropping
Cropping should not change the meaning of the image, nor should it be neglected. There should be just enough, but it should not change the message of the image.
10. Mergers and avoiding them
Mergers, or where an object seams to continue along with another object, should be avoided so that the focus can be on the main subject.
3.
Aperture: the opening, similar to the iris in a human eye, that affects focus and depth of field in an image.
Shutter Speed: the speed at which the shutter, or the eyelid, closes and bloke light, and opens and lets light in.
ISO: the sensitivity of the light sensor to light, affecting the brightness and grainy quality of the image.
4.Any manipulation of an image to change the message or meaning is unethical in any resolve. Any change to the image should not change the expression, the meaning, or the message portrayed in the image.
5. Environmental: type where people are situated in a setting where they would naturally be, or where they would frequent.
Self: reflecting on oneself, where the photographer is the subject of the image, and reflects on the current situation or state of mind of the photographer, while sometimes portraying a meaning or message.
Casual: where the subject is not positioned in a natural or artificial setting, but where the subject is featured in a setting where you may find anyone, where the viewer can relate.
6.
Exposure: the amount of light apparent in the image
Depth of Field: where objects closer to the person are larger than objects farther away.
Focal Length: the angel of view, where it determines the magnification and wide angle
7.
Early: These magazines where predominantly like books, they where not with many pictures if any, and there where few generic images associated with them.
Poster: Individual pictures where chosen, and printed, and Little or no get was used. It was still more like a book, but magazines had established themselves as a news and entertainment source.
Married to Type: Text now features a predominant role in the magazine cover, images are widely used in the magazine, there is clear branding, and the main focus is split between the text and image.
Forrest of Words: Text now is the most important part of the magazine cover, and text is the only clearly discernible thing, the images take a back seat, and the text is now in a front seat role.
Monday, December 8, 2014
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)